What if the Houston 5 are in the Wrong?

As of the week, 11/18-11/25, 2014 local government officials began subpoena processes on the sermons (speeches) of 5 Christian pastors in Houston, TX. This is a clear violation of separation of Church and State and freedom of religion, IF AND ONLY IF these pastors’ speeches and operations are free from political interests for and/or against candidates in times of election or for and/or against civil ordinance referendum process.

Our Freedom of Religion in America is not a carte blanche pass to mix Church and State interests. Using the pulpit for political purposes would be an abuse of power; and these pastors were admittedly organizationally involved as leaders in political petitioning, which compromises their 501c3 status and gives reasonable cause for these subpoenas. When a church files for 501c3 status, it declares to the Government that it is not politically involved with political parties, candidates, campaigning or lobbying.

When these pastors took it upon themselves to lead in a civil petition effort, they forfeited the religious integrity of their pulpit and churches. In our governmental system, one may either be an official religious leader or one may be an official political leader, but the two may not mix. According to the Christian Post, “they all participated in the coalition of 400 Houston area churches that stood in disapproval of the ordinance.” Though these pastors may have had good intentions in wanting the people of Houston to have a vote and recourse via a referendum, they should not have compromised their pulpits and ministries’ integrity to do it. They should have resigned before organizing and/or taking leading roles in this political action. If they wish the local government to not “mess with Texas pulpits,” then Texas pulpits initially should not have become political lobbying centers.

At the most, these pastors’ licenses (if they have them) may be pulled or suspended, and their churches may lose 501c3 status due to their political involvement.

………………………………

SOURCES:

Politifact

Christian Post

________________

UPDATE: Oct. 20, 2014

Though Houston Mayor, Annise Parker Withdraws Subpoenas as a result of national outcry (not legality), the Scandal is not Fully Resolved in the minds of many Christians. While I am an advocate of freedom of religion and the separation of Church and State which results from that freedom; and while I do not believe that the State should “silence the Church” whimsically, I must agree with David Feldman and Annise Parker when they say this outcry reveals how little the American people understand the 1st Amendment as it applies to local and Federal laws.

On the other hand, I also observe that Annise Parker and David Feldman do not fully understand the 1st Amendment’s implications for governmental representatives. David Feldman is only partially correct in saying, “If someone is speaking from the pulpit and it’s political speech, then it’s not going to be protected.” Annise Parker is likewise at a half-fault for saying, “If the 5 pastors used pulpits for politics, their sermons are fair game.” Though a solid argument can be made from theology that opinion should not be spread from the pulpit, political opinion as it touches morality and faith can be legally stated from a religious figure, so long as it is clearly stated as personal opinion.

The fine legal line which must not be crossed by ministers is: political activity (ex. campaigning, lobbying, petition drive/organization, referendum action) by religious leaders (i.e. licensed and employed 501c3 clergy). On crossing that line, the Houston pastors and their sermons (speeches) were indeed “fair game.”

Conversely, the legal lines which must not be crossed by governmental office holders is: intimidation and/or infringement upon::

  1. The right of the people to freely gather and lawfully practice religion.
  2. The right to freedom of speech.

………………………………..

OTHER RESOURCES:

Balancing God and Government: Same-Sex Marriage

Break Not, Quench Not: Reconciling God’s Mercy and Justice

Christians and Moral Ethics: An Open Letter

Homosexuality and Hate

Sexual Identity and Equality

Sociopolitical Conservatism is Not Christianity

The Kingdom of Heaven and Its Keys

Truth is Precious–Handle with Care

2 thoughts on “What if the Houston 5 are in the Wrong?

  1. Churches have traditionally been involved in the political process, and should be today, and can be done legally today. They must present both sides of the argument, they can offer “get out the vote” campaigns, they can offer to take people to vote. They can obviously state their position in any area of discussion.
    Churches should give up their tax free status if it means they must give up their integrity. It is more important to teach people the truth, and God’s position on any issue, political or non-political than get a tax break.

  2. Thank you for your reply! I agree with your statements, though I must add that the Houston pastors were more directly involved than the parameters described by statements you make, and so, fit the description which I and the news reports (linked above) have reflected.

    I also agree with your statement, “It is more important to teach people the truth, and God’s position on any issue, political or non-political, than get a tax break.” Yet, if these churches and church leaders initially self-identified as 501c3 and submitted themselves to governmental conditions, then why all the fuss when they are held accountable for their non-compliance?

    As for churches’ (as organizations and denominations) having been traditionally involved in political processes, I agree that this has taken place and that there are legal ways to do it–mostly through parachurch organisations or denominational representation. Yes, a pastor may choose to supply an independently created and accurate voter guide, if he wishes. But, whenever clergy begin political campaigning or lobbying or even intimidating / “coercing” voters, that is a clear abuse of power. I believe the best advice against this is: teach people God’s truth in order to honorably affect their consciences; then trust them and God by encouraging the people to vote & to vote their consciences.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s